On 10/20/20 12:03 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 12:51:02 +0200 Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>>> +struct bpf_nh_params {
>>> + u8 nh_family;
>>> + union {
>>> + __u32 ipv4_nh;
>>> + struct in6_addr ipv6_nh;
>>> + };
>>> +};
>>
>> Folks, not directly related to this set, but there's a SRv6 patch going
>> around which adds ifindex, otherwise nh can't be link local.
>>
>> I wonder if we want to consider this use case from the start (or the
>> close approximation of start in this case ;)).
>
> The ifindex is there, it's just in the function call signature instead
> of the struct... Or did you mean something different?
>
ifindex as the first argument qualifies the device for the address.
