Re: [PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: export bpf_object__reuse_map() to libbpf api

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 7:34 PM Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 04:03:45PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> > > bpf_map__set_pin_path()
> > > bpf_create_map_in_map()    <- create inner or outer map
> > > bpf_map__reuse_fd(map, inner/outer_fd)
> > > bpf_object__load(obj)
> > >   - bpf_object__load_xattr()
> > >     - bpf_object__create_maps()
> > >       - if (map->fd >= 0)
> > >           continue      <- this will skip pinning map
> >
> > so maybe that's the part that needs to be fixed?..
>
> Hmm...maybe, let me see
>
> >
> > I'm still not sure. And to be honest your examples are still a bit too
> > succinct for me to follow where the problem is exactly. Can you please
> > elaborate a bit more?
>
> Let's take iproute2 legacy map for example, if it's a map-in-map type with
> pin path defined. In user space we could do like:
>
> if (bpf_obj_get(pathname) < 0) {
>         bpf_create_map_in_map();
>         bpf_map__reuse_fd(map, map_fd);
> }
> bpf_map__set_pin_path(map, pathname);
> bpf_object__load(obj)
>
> So in libbpf we need
>
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> index 32dc444224d8..5412aa7169db 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> @@ -4215,7 +4215,7 @@ bpf_object__create_maps(struct bpf_object *obj)
>                 if (map->fd >= 0) {
>                         pr_debug("map '%s': skipping creation (preset fd=%d)\n",
>                                  map->name, map->fd);
> -                       continue;
> +                       goto check_pin_path;
>                 }
>
>                 err = bpf_object__create_map(obj, map);
> @@ -4258,6 +4258,7 @@ bpf_object__create_maps(struct bpf_object *obj)
>                         map->init_slots_sz = 0;
>                 }
>
> +check_pin_path:
>                 if (map->pin_path && !map->pinned) {
>                         err = bpf_map__pin(map, NULL);
>                         if (err) {
>
>
> Do you think if this change be better?

Yes, of course. Just don't do it through use of goto. Guard map
creation with that if instead.

>
> Thanks
> Hangbin



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux