On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 04:03:45PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > > bpf_map__set_pin_path() > > bpf_create_map_in_map() <- create inner or outer map > > bpf_map__reuse_fd(map, inner/outer_fd) > > bpf_object__load(obj) > > - bpf_object__load_xattr() > > - bpf_object__create_maps() > > - if (map->fd >= 0) > > continue <- this will skip pinning map > > so maybe that's the part that needs to be fixed?.. Hmm...maybe, let me see > > I'm still not sure. And to be honest your examples are still a bit too > succinct for me to follow where the problem is exactly. Can you please > elaborate a bit more? Let's take iproute2 legacy map for example, if it's a map-in-map type with pin path defined. In user space we could do like: if (bpf_obj_get(pathname) < 0) { bpf_create_map_in_map(); bpf_map__reuse_fd(map, map_fd); } bpf_map__set_pin_path(map, pathname); bpf_object__load(obj) So in libbpf we need diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c index 32dc444224d8..5412aa7169db 100644 --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c @@ -4215,7 +4215,7 @@ bpf_object__create_maps(struct bpf_object *obj) if (map->fd >= 0) { pr_debug("map '%s': skipping creation (preset fd=%d)\n", map->name, map->fd); - continue; + goto check_pin_path; } err = bpf_object__create_map(obj, map); @@ -4258,6 +4258,7 @@ bpf_object__create_maps(struct bpf_object *obj) map->init_slots_sz = 0; } +check_pin_path: if (map->pin_path && !map->pinned) { err = bpf_map__pin(map, NULL); if (err) { Do you think if this change be better? Thanks Hangbin