Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 3/3] selftests: bpf: Test iterating a sockmap

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 11:11 AM Yonghong Song <yhs@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 9/9/20 9:27 AM, Lorenz Bauer wrote:
> > Add a test that exercises a basic sockmap / sockhash iteration. For
> > now we simply count the number of elements seen. Once sockmap update
> > from iterators works we can extend this to perform a full copy.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >   .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c  | 89 +++++++++++++++++++
> >   tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter.h  |  9 ++
> >   .../selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_sockmap.c    | 43 +++++++++
> >   .../selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_sockmap.h    |  3 +
> >   4 files changed, 144 insertions(+)
> >   create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_sockmap.c
> >   create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_sockmap.h
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c
> > index 0b79d78b98db..3215f4d22720 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c
> > @@ -6,6 +6,9 @@
> >   #include "test_skmsg_load_helpers.skel.h"
> >   #include "test_sockmap_update.skel.h"
> >   #include "test_sockmap_invalid_update.skel.h"
> > +#include "bpf_iter_sockmap.skel.h"
> > +
> > +#include "progs/bpf_iter_sockmap.h"
> >
> >   #define TCP_REPAIR          19      /* TCP sock is under repair right now */
> >
> > @@ -171,6 +174,88 @@ static void test_sockmap_invalid_update(void)
> >               test_sockmap_invalid_update__destroy(skel);
> >   }
> >
> > +static void test_sockmap_iter(enum bpf_map_type map_type)
> > +{
> > +     DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_iter_attach_opts, opts);
> > +     int err, len, src_fd, iter_fd, duration;
> > +     union bpf_iter_link_info linfo = {0};
> > +     __s64 sock_fd[SOCKMAP_MAX_ENTRIES];
> > +     __u32 i, num_sockets, max_elems;
> > +     struct bpf_iter_sockmap *skel;
> > +     struct bpf_link *link;
> > +     struct bpf_map *src;
> > +     char buf[64];
> > +
> > +     skel = bpf_iter_sockmap__open_and_load();
> > +     if (CHECK(!skel, "bpf_iter_sockmap__open_and_load", "skeleton open_and_load failed\n"))
> > +             return;
> > +
> > +     for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(sock_fd); i++)
> > +             sock_fd[i] = -1;
> > +
> > +     /* Make sure we have at least one "empty" entry to test iteration of
> > +      * an empty slot.
> > +      */
> > +     num_sockets = ARRAY_SIZE(sock_fd) - 1;
> > +
> > +     if (map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_SOCKMAP) {
> > +             src = skel->maps.sockmap;
> > +             max_elems = bpf_map__max_entries(src);
> > +     } else {
> > +             src = skel->maps.sockhash;
> > +             max_elems = num_sockets;
> > +     }
>
> I know you include the shared header progs/bpf_iter_sockmap.h to
> supply SOCKMAP_MAX_ENTRIES in order to define sock_fd array.
>
> I think it is easier to understand if just using bpf_map__max_entries()
> for both sockmap and sockhash to get max_elems and do dynamic allocation
> for sock_fd. WDYT?

imo makes sense as a follow up.

I fixed up "duration = 0" in this test because of build warnings
and pushed the whole set.
Thanks



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux