Re: pull-request: bpf 2020-07-31

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 03:51:45PM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> Hi David,
> 
> The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net* tree.
> 
> We've added 5 non-merge commits during the last 21 day(s) which contain
> a total of 5 files changed, 126 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-).
> 
> The main changes are:
> 
> 1) Fix a map element leak in HASH_OF_MAPS map type, from Andrii Nakryiko.
> 
> 2) Fix a NULL pointer dereference in __btf_resolve_helper_id() when no
>    btf_vmlinux is available, from Peilin Ye.
> 
> 3) Init pos variable in __bpfilter_process_sockopt(), from Christoph Hellwig.
> 
> 4) Fix a cgroup sockopt verifier test by specifying expected attach type,
>    from Jean-Philippe Brucker.
> 
> Please consider pulling these changes from:
> 
>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf.git
> 
> Thanks a lot!
> 
> Note that when net gets merged into net-next later on, there is a small
> merge conflict in kernel/bpf/btf.c between commit 5b801dfb7feb ("bpf: Fix
> NULL pointer dereference in __btf_resolve_helper_id()") from the bpf tree
> and commit 138b9a0511c7 ("bpf: Remove btf_id helpers resolving") from the
> net-next tree.
> 
> Resolve as follows: remove the old hunk with the __btf_resolve_helper_id()
> function. Change the btf_resolve_helper_id() so it actually tests for a
> NULL btf_vmlinux and bails out:
> 
> int btf_resolve_helper_id(struct bpf_verifier_log *log,
>                           const struct bpf_func_proto *fn, int arg)
> {
>         int id;
> 
>         if (fn->arg_type[arg] != ARG_PTR_TO_BTF_ID || !btf_vmlinux)
>                 return -EINVAL;
>         id = fn->btf_id[arg];
>         if (!id || id > btf_vmlinux->nr_types)
>                 return -EINVAL;
>         return id;
> }
> 
> Let me know if you run into any others issues (CC'ing Jiri Olsa so he's in
> the loop with regards to merge conflict resolution).

we'll loose the bpf_log message, but I'm fine with that ;-) looks good

thanks,
jirka




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux