On 7/31/20 8:16 AM, Jianlin Lv wrote:
Clang compiler version: 12.0.0
The following warning appears during the selftests/bpf compilation:
prog_tests/send_signal.c:51:3: warning: ignoring return value of ‘write’,
declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result]
51 | write(pipe_c2p[1], buf, 1);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
prog_tests/send_signal.c:54:3: warning: ignoring return value of ‘read’,
declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result]
54 | read(pipe_p2c[0], buf, 1);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
......
prog_tests/stacktrace_build_id_nmi.c:13:2: warning: ignoring return value
of ‘fscanf’,declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-resul]
13 | fscanf(f, "%llu", &sample_freq);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
test_tcpnotify_user.c:133:2: warning:ignoring return value of ‘system’,
declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result]
133 | system(test_script);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
test_tcpnotify_user.c:138:2: warning:ignoring return value of ‘system’,
declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result]
138 | system(test_script);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
test_tcpnotify_user.c:143:2: warning:ignoring return value of ‘system’,
declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result]
143 | system(test_script);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Add code that fix compilation warning about ignoring return value and
handles any errors; Check return value of library`s API make the code
more secure.
Signed-off-by: Jianlin Lv <Jianlin.Lv@xxxxxxx>
Looks good overall, there is one small bug that slipped in, see below:
[...]
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_tcpnotify_user.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_tcpnotify_user.c
index f9765ddf0761..869e28c92d73 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_tcpnotify_user.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_tcpnotify_user.c
@@ -130,17 +130,26 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
sprintf(test_script,
"iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport %d -j DROP",
TESTPORT);
- system(test_script);
+ if (system(test_script)) {
+ printf("FAILED: execute command: %s\n", test_script);
+ goto err;
+ }
sprintf(test_script,
"nc 127.0.0.1 %d < /etc/passwd > /dev/null 2>&1 ",
TESTPORT);
- system(test_script);
+ if (system(test_script)) {
+ printf("FAILED: execute command: %s\n", test_script);
+ goto err;
+ }
Did you try to run this test case? With the patch here it will fail:
# ./test_tcpnotify_user
FAILED: execute command: nc 127.0.0.1 12877 < /etc/passwd > /dev/null 2>&1
This is because nc returns 1 as exit code and for the test it is actually expected
to fail given the iptables rule we installed for TESTPORT right above and remove
again below.
Please adapt this and send a v2, thanks!
sprintf(test_script,
"iptables -D INPUT -p tcp --dport %d -j DROP",
TESTPORT);
- system(test_script);
+ if (system(test_script)) {
+ printf("FAILED: execute command: %s\n", test_script);
+ goto err;
+ }
rv = bpf_map_lookup_elem(bpf_map__fd(global_map), &key, &g);
if (rv != 0) {
