On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 5:38 PM Yonghong Song <yhs@xxxxxx> wrote: > > In my VM, I got identical result compared to /proc/net/{tcp,tcp6}. > For tcp6: > $ cat /proc/net/tcp6 > sl local_address remote_address st tx_queue rx_queue tr tm->when retrnsmt uid timeout inode > 0: 00000000000000000000000000000000:0016 00000000000000000000000000000000:0000 0A 00000000:00000000 00:00000001 00000000 0 0 17955 1 000000003eb3102e 100 0 0 10 0 > > $ cat /sys/fs/bpf/p1 > sl local_address remote_address st tx_queue rx_queue tr tm->when retrnsmt uid timeout inode > 0: 00000000000000000000000000000000:0016 00000000000000000000000000000000:0000 0A 00000000:00000000 00:00000000 00000000 0 0 17955 1 000000003eb3102e 100 0 0 10 0 > > For tcp: > $ cat /proc/net/tcp > sl local_address rem_address st tx_queue rx_queue tr tm->when retrnsmt uid timeout inode > 0: 00000000:0016 00000000:0000 0A 00000000:00000000 00:00000000 00000000 0 0 2666 1 000000007152e43f 100 0 0 10 0 > $ cat /sys/fs/bpf/p2 > sl local_address remote_address st tx_queue rx_queue tr tm->when retrnsmt uid timeout inode > 1: 00000000:0016 00000000:0000 0A 00000000:00000000 00:00000000 00000000 0 0 2666 1 000000007152e43f 100 0 0 10 0 > > Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@xxxxxx> > --- Looks reasonable, to the extent possible ;) Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@xxxxxx> > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter.h | 15 ++ > .../selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_tcp4.c | 235 ++++++++++++++++ > .../selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_tcp6.c | 250 ++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 500 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_tcp4.c > create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_tcp6.c > [...] > +static int hlist_unhashed_lockless(const struct hlist_node *h) > +{ > + return !(h->pprev); > +} > + > +static int timer_pending(const struct timer_list * timer) > +{ > + return !hlist_unhashed_lockless(&timer->entry); > +} > + > +extern unsigned CONFIG_HZ __kconfig __weak; Why the __weak? We expect to have /proc/kconfig.gz in other tests anyway? __weak will make CONFIG_HZ to be a zero and you'll get a bunch of divisions by zero. > + > +#define USER_HZ 100 > +#define NSEC_PER_SEC 1000000000ULL > +static clock_t jiffies_to_clock_t(unsigned long x) > +{ > + /* The implementation here tailored to a particular > + * setting of USER_HZ. > + */ > + u64 tick_nsec = (NSEC_PER_SEC + CONFIG_HZ/2) / CONFIG_HZ; > + u64 user_hz_nsec = NSEC_PER_SEC / USER_HZ; > + > + if ((tick_nsec % user_hz_nsec) == 0) { > + if (CONFIG_HZ < USER_HZ) > + return x * (USER_HZ / CONFIG_HZ); > + else > + return x / (CONFIG_HZ / USER_HZ); > + } > + return x * tick_nsec/user_hz_nsec; > +} > + [...] > + if (sk_common->skc_family != AF_INET) > + return 0; > + > + tp = bpf_skc_to_tcp_sock(sk_common); > + if (tp) { > + return dump_tcp_sock(seq, tp, uid, seq_num); > + } nit: unnecessary {} > + > + tw = bpf_skc_to_tcp_timewait_sock(sk_common); > + if (tw) > + return dump_tw_sock(seq, tw, uid, seq_num); > + > + req = bpf_skc_to_tcp_request_sock(sk_common); > + if (req) > + return dump_req_sock(seq, req, uid, seq_num); > + > + return 0; > +} [...] > +static int timer_pending(const struct timer_list * timer) > +{ > + return !hlist_unhashed_lockless(&timer->entry); > +} > + > +extern unsigned CONFIG_HZ __kconfig __weak; same about __weak here > + > +#define USER_HZ 100 > +#define NSEC_PER_SEC 1000000000ULL > +static clock_t jiffies_to_clock_t(unsigned long x) > +{ > + /* The implementation here tailored to a particular > + * setting of USER_HZ. > + */ > + u64 tick_nsec = (NSEC_PER_SEC + CONFIG_HZ/2) / CONFIG_HZ; > + u64 user_hz_nsec = NSEC_PER_SEC / USER_HZ; > + > + if ((tick_nsec % user_hz_nsec) == 0) { > + if (CONFIG_HZ < USER_HZ) > + return x * (USER_HZ / CONFIG_HZ); > + else > + return x / (CONFIG_HZ / USER_HZ); > + } > + return x * tick_nsec/user_hz_nsec; > +} nit: jiffies_to_clock_t() implementation looks like an overkill for this use case... Would it be just `x / CONFIG_HZ * NSEC_PER_SEC` with some potential rounding error? > + > +static clock_t jiffies_delta_to_clock_t(long delta) > +{ > + if (delta <= 0) > + return 0; > + > + return jiffies_to_clock_t(delta); > +} > + [...]