On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 12:00 PM Song Liu <song@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 8:45 AM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Currenty lsm uses bpf_tracing_func_proto helpers which do > > not include stack trace or perf event output. It's useful > > to have those for bpftrace lsm support [1]. > > > > Using tracing_prog_func_proto helpers for lsm programs. > > How about using raw_tp_prog_func_proto? why? I think skb/xdp_output is useful for lsm progs too. So I've applied the patch. > PS: Please tag the patch with subject prefix "PATCH bpf" for > "PATCH bpf-next". I think this one belongs to bpf-next, which means > we should wait after the merge window. +1. Jiri, pls tag the subject properly.
