On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 8:45 AM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Currenty lsm uses bpf_tracing_func_proto helpers which do > not include stack trace or perf event output. It's useful > to have those for bpftrace lsm support [1]. > > Using tracing_prog_func_proto helpers for lsm programs. How about using raw_tp_prog_func_proto? Thanks, Song PS: Please tag the patch with subject prefix "PATCH bpf" for "PATCH bpf-next". I think this one belongs to bpf-next, which means we should wait after the merge window.
