On Fri, 29 May 2020 09:36:14 -0600 David Ahern <dsahern@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 5/29/20 2:22 AM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > > We do need this struct bpf_devmap_val, but I think it is wrong to make this UAPI. > > > > A BPF-prog can get this via: #include "vmlinux.h" > > sure. I see that now. > > I forgot to fold in a small update to the selftests, so I need to send a > v4 anyways. I will wait until later in the day in case there are other > comments. I've just posted a patchset on top of this V3, that moves struct bpf_devmap_val, and that demonstrate via code that I mean by leveraging BTF for dynamic config API. https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/159076794319.1387573.8722376887638960093.stgit@firesoul/ -- Best regards, Jesper Dangaard Brouer MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
