Re: [selftests/bpf] da43712a72: kernel-selftests.bpf.make_fail

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5/14/20 3:30 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 11:14:20AM +0800, Hangbin Liu wrote:
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 12:26:34PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 05:58:35PM +0800, Hangbin Liu wrote:

Thanks test bot catch the issue.
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 03:44:18PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
Greeting,

FYI, we noticed the following commit (built with gcc-7):

commit: 77bb53cb094828a31cd3c5b402899810f63073c1 ("selftests/bpf: Fix perf_buffer test on systems w/ offline CPUs")
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y

The author for this commit is Andrii(cc'd).

Mine is f1c3656c6d9c ("selftests/bpf: Skip perf hw events test if the setup disabled it")
prog_tests/stacktrace_build_id_nmi.c:55:3: error: label ‘cleanup’ used but not defined
    goto cleanup;
    ^~~~

Hi Greg, we are missing a depend commit
dde53c1b763b ("selftests/bpf: Convert few more selftest to skeletons").

So either we need backport this patch, or if you like, we can also fix it by
changing 'goto cleanup;' to 'goto close_prog;'. So which one do you prefer?

Hi, sorry for late reply, missed emails earlier.

The above "selftest to skeletons" commit will need some more after that, it's going to be a pretty big back-port, so I think just fixing it up would be ok.


I don't know, I have no context here at all, sorry.

What stable kernel tree is failing, what patch needs to be changed, what
patch caused this, and so on...

confused,

Oh, sorry, I should reply the full email. I will forward the full message in
the bellow. For your questions:

the stable kernel tree is linux-5.4.y,
my patch is da43712a7262 ("selftests/bpf: Skip perf hw events test if the
setup disabled it")[1].

The reason is we are lacking upstream commit
dde53c1b763b ("selftests/bpf: Convert few more selftest to skeletons").

This will call build warning
prog_tests/stacktrace_build_id_nmi.c:55:3: error: label ‘cleanup’ used but not defined
    goto cleanup;
    ^~~~

To fix it, I think the easiest way is change the "goto cleanup" to "goto
close_prog".

Ok, can you send a patch for this, documenting all of the above so I
know what's going on?

For the other error:

prog_tests/perf_buffer.c: In function ‘test_perf_buffer’:
prog_tests/perf_buffer.c:39:8: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘parse_cpu_mask_file’ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
   err = parse_cpu_mask_file("/sys/devices/system/cpu/online",
         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../lib.mk:138: recipe for target '/usr/src/perf_selftests-x86_64-rhel-7.6-kselftests-da43712a7262891317883d4b3a909fb18dac4b1d/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs' failed
make: *** [/usr/src/perf_selftests-x86_64-rhel-7.6-kselftests-da43712a7262891317883d4b3a909fb18dac4b1d/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs] Error 1
make: Leaving directory '/usr/src/perf_selftests-x86_64-rhel-7.6-kselftests-da43712a7262891317883d4b3a909fb18dac4b1d/tools/testing/selftests/bpf'

I think Andrii may like help.

That looks like a bug, we should revert the offending patch, right?

6803ee25f0ea ("libbpf: Extract and generalize CPU mask parsing logic") added parse_cpu_mask_file() function, so back-porting that commit should solve this? It should be straightforward and shouldn't bring any more dependent commits.


thanks,

greg k-h





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux