Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/3] samples: bpf: refactor kprobe tracing user progs with libbpf

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 5/12/20 7:43 AM, Daniel T. Lee wrote:
Currently, the kprobe BPF program attachment method for bpf_load is
quite old. The implementation of bpf_load "directly" controls and
manages(create, delete) the kprobe events of DEBUGFS. On the other hand,
using using the libbpf automatically manages the kprobe event.
(under bpf_link interface)

By calling bpf_program__attach(_kprobe) in libbpf, the corresponding
kprobe is created and the BPF program will be attached to this kprobe.
To remove this, by simply invoking bpf_link__destroy will clean up the
event.

This commit refactors kprobe tracing programs (tracex{1~7}_user.c) with
libbpf using bpf_link interface and bpf_program__attach.

tracex2_kern.c, which tracks system calls (sys_*), has been modified to
append prefix depending on architecture.

Signed-off-by: Daniel T. Lee <danieltimlee@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  samples/bpf/Makefile       | 12 +++----
  samples/bpf/tracex1_user.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++----
  samples/bpf/tracex2_kern.c |  8 ++++-
  samples/bpf/tracex2_user.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
  samples/bpf/tracex3_user.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
  samples/bpf/tracex4_user.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
  samples/bpf/tracex6_user.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
  samples/bpf/tracex7_user.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++-----
  8 files changed, 268 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)

diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile b/samples/bpf/Makefile
index 424f6fe7ce38..4c91e5914329 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/Makefile
+++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile
@@ -64,13 +64,13 @@ fds_example-objs := fds_example.o
  sockex1-objs := sockex1_user.o
  sockex2-objs := sockex2_user.o
  sockex3-objs := bpf_load.o sockex3_user.o
-tracex1-objs := bpf_load.o tracex1_user.o $(TRACE_HELPERS)
-tracex2-objs := bpf_load.o tracex2_user.o
-tracex3-objs := bpf_load.o tracex3_user.o
-tracex4-objs := bpf_load.o tracex4_user.o
+tracex1-objs := tracex1_user.o $(TRACE_HELPERS)
+tracex2-objs := tracex2_user.o
+tracex3-objs := tracex3_user.o
+tracex4-objs := tracex4_user.o
  tracex5-objs := bpf_load.o tracex5_user.o $(TRACE_HELPERS)
-tracex6-objs := bpf_load.o tracex6_user.o
-tracex7-objs := bpf_load.o tracex7_user.o
+tracex6-objs := tracex6_user.o
+tracex7-objs := tracex7_user.o
  test_probe_write_user-objs := bpf_load.o test_probe_write_user_user.o
  trace_output-objs := bpf_load.o trace_output_user.o $(TRACE_HELPERS)
  lathist-objs := bpf_load.o lathist_user.o
diff --git a/samples/bpf/tracex1_user.c b/samples/bpf/tracex1_user.c
index 55fddbd08702..1b15ab98f7d3 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/tracex1_user.c
+++ b/samples/bpf/tracex1_user.c
@@ -1,21 +1,45 @@
  // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
  #include <stdio.h>
-#include <linux/bpf.h>
  #include <unistd.h>
-#include <bpf/bpf.h>
-#include "bpf_load.h"
+#include <bpf/libbpf.h>
  #include "trace_helpers.h"
+#define __must_check

This is not very user friendly.
Maybe not including linux/err.h and
use libbpf API libbpf_get_error() instead?

+#include <linux/err.h>
+
  int main(int ac, char **argv)
  {
-	FILE *f;
+	struct bpf_link *link = NULL;
+	struct bpf_program *prog;
+	struct bpf_object *obj;
  	char filename[256];
+	FILE *f;
snprintf(filename, sizeof(filename), "%s_kern.o", argv[0]);
+	obj = bpf_object__open_file(filename, NULL);
+	if (IS_ERR(obj)) {
+		fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: opening BPF object file failed\n");
+		obj = NULL;
+		goto cleanup;

You do not need to goto cleanup, directly return 0 is okay here.
The same for other files in this patch.

+	}
+
+	prog = bpf_object__find_program_by_name(obj, "bpf_prog1");
+	if (!prog) {
+		fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: finding a prog in obj file failed\n");
+		goto cleanup;
+	}
+
+	/* load BPF program */
+	if (bpf_object__load(obj)) {
+		fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: loading BPF object file failed\n");
+		goto cleanup;
+	}
- if (load_bpf_file(filename)) {
-		printf("%s", bpf_log_buf);
-		return 1;
+	link = bpf_program__attach(prog);
+	if (IS_ERR(link)) {
+		fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: bpf_program__attach failed\n");
+		link = NULL;
+		goto cleanup;
  	}
f = popen("taskset 1 ping -c5 localhost", "r");
@@ -23,5 +47,8 @@ int main(int ac, char **argv)
read_trace_pipe(); +cleanup:
+	bpf_link__destroy(link);
+	bpf_object__close(obj);

Typically in kernel, we do multiple labels for such cases
like
destroy_link:
	bpf_link__destroy(link);
close_object:
	bpf_object__close(obj);

The error path in the main() function jumps to proper label.
This is more clean and less confusion.

The same for other cases in this file.

  	return 0;
  }
diff --git a/samples/bpf/tracex2_kern.c b/samples/bpf/tracex2_kern.c
index d865bb309bcb..ff5d00916733 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/tracex2_kern.c
+++ b/samples/bpf/tracex2_kern.c
@@ -11,6 +11,12 @@
  #include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
  #include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
+#ifdef __x86_64__
+#define SYSCALL "__x64_"
+#else
+#define SYSCALL
+#endif

See test_progs.h, one more case to handle:
#ifdef __x86_64__
#define SYS_NANOSLEEP_KPROBE_NAME "__x64_sys_nanosleep"
#elif defined(__s390x__)
#define SYS_NANOSLEEP_KPROBE_NAME "__s390x_sys_nanosleep"
#else
#define SYS_NANOSLEEP_KPROBE_NAME "sys_nanosleep"
#endif

+
  struct bpf_map_def SEC("maps") my_map = {
  	.type = BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH,
  	.key_size = sizeof(long),
@@ -77,7 +83,7 @@ struct bpf_map_def SEC("maps") my_hist_map = {
  	.max_entries = 1024,
  };
-SEC("kprobe/sys_write")
+SEC("kprobe/" SYSCALL "sys_write")
  int bpf_prog3(struct pt_regs *ctx)
  {
  	long write_size = PT_REGS_PARM3(ctx);
[...]



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux