Re: [PATCH net v2] veth: xdp: use head instead of hard_start

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 12:59 AM Jesper Dangaard Brouer
<brouer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I want to wait to ease your life as maintainer. This is part of a
> larger patchset (for XDP frame_sz) and the next patch touch same code
> path and thus depend on these code adjustments.  If we apply them in
> bpf vs bpf-next then you/we will have to handle merge conflicts.  The
> severity of the "fix" is really low, it only means 32 bytes less
> headroom (which I doubt anyone is using).

Ahh. Make sense. That type of fix can wait.
Thanks!



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux