On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 04:18:41AM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > On Tue, 31 Mar 2020 at 21:02, Greg Kroah-Hartman > <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.5.14 release. > > There are 171 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Thu, 02 Apr 2020 14:12:02 +0000. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.5.14-rc2.gz > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.5.y > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > > Results from Linaro’s test farm. > Regressions on x86_64 and i386. > > selftests bpf test_verifier reports as failed. > This test PASSED on v5.5.13 > > #554/p jgt32: range bound deduction, reg op imm FAIL > Failed to load prog 'Success'! > R8 unbounded memory access, make sure to bounds check any array access > into a map > verification time 141 usec > stack depth 8 > processed 16 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 0 total_states > 1 peak_states 1 mark_read 1 > #555/p jgt32: range bound deduction, reg1 op reg2, reg1 unknown FAIL > Failed to load prog 'Success'! > R8 unbounded memory access, make sure to bounds check any array access > into a map > verification time 94 usec > stack depth 8 > processed 17 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 0 total_states > 1 peak_states 1 mark_read 1 > #556/p jle32: range bound deduction, reg1 op reg2, reg2 unknown FAIL > Failed to load prog 'Success'! > R8 unbounded memory access, make sure to bounds check any array access > into a map > verification time 68 usec > stack depth 8 > processed 17 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 0 total_states > 1 peak_states 1 mark_read 1 Can you run 'git bisect' to find the offending patch? thanks, greg k-h
