Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/4] xdp: Support specifying expected existing program when attaching XDP

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 31/03/2020 04:43, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 04:25:07PM +0100, Edward Cree wrote:
>> Everything that a human operator can do, so can any program with the
>>  same capabilities/wheel bits.  Especially as the API that the
>>  operator-tool uses *will* be open and documented.  The Unix Way does
>>  not allow unscriptable interfaces, and heavily frowns at any kind of
>>  distinction between 'humans' and 'programs'.
> can you share a link on such philosophy?
It's not quite as explicit about it as I'd like, but
 http://www.catb.org/esr/writings/taoup/html/ch01s06.html#id2877684
 is the closest I can find right now.

-ed



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux