Re: call for bpf progs. Re: [PATCHv2 bpf-next 5/5] selftests: bpf: add test for sk_assign

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 3:03 AM Lorenz Bauer <lmb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for bringing this up.
> > Yonghong, please correct me if I'm wrong.
> > I think you've experimented with tracking spilled constants. The first issue
> > came with spilling of 4 byte constant. The verifier tracks 8 byte slots and
> > lots of places assume that slot granularity. It's not clear yet how to refactor
> > the verifier. Ideas, help are greatly appreciated.
> > The second concern was pruning, but iirc the experiments were inconclusive.
> > selftests/bpf only has old fb progs. Hence, I think, the step zero is for
> > everyone to contribute their bpf programs written in C. If we have both
> > cilium and cloudflare progs as selftests it will help a lot to guide such long
> > lasting verifier decisions.
>
> Ok, I'll try to get something sorted out. We have a TC classifier that
> would be suitable,
> and I've been meaning to get it open sourced. Does the integration into the
> test suite have to involve running packets through it, or is compile
> and load enough?

It would be great if you can add it as part of test_progs and run it
with one or two packets via prog_test_run like all the tests do.
Thanks!



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux