On 3/14/20 1:27 AM, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
Amazingly, some libc implementations don't call __NR_nanosleep syscall from
their nanosleep() APIs. Hammer it down with explicit syscall() call and never
get back to it again. Also simplify code for timespec initialization.
I verified that nanosleep is called w/ printk and in exactly same Linux image
that is used in Travis CI. So it should both sleep and call correct syscall.
v1->v2:
- math is too hard, fix usec -> nsec convertion (Martin);
- test_vmlinux has explicit nanosleep() call, convert that one as well.
Fixes: 4e1fd25d19e8 ("selftests/bpf: Fix usleep() implementation")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@xxxxxx>
Applied, thanks!
