On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 05:27:43PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > Amazingly, some libc implementations don't call __NR_nanosleep syscall from > their nanosleep() APIs. Hammer it down with explicit syscall() call and never > get back to it again. Also simplify code for timespec initialization. > > I verified that nanosleep is called w/ printk and in exactly same Linux image > that is used in Travis CI. So it should both sleep and call correct syscall. > > v1->v2: > - math is too hard, fix usec -> nsec convertion (Martin); > - test_vmlinux has explicit nanosleep() call, convert that one as well. Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@xxxxxx>
