On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 5:46 PM David Ahern <dsahern@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 2/3/20 5:56 PM, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > > Great! Just to disambiguate and make sure we are in agreement, my hope > > here is that iproute2 can completely delegate to libbpf all the ELF > > > > iproute2 needs to compile and continue working as is when libbpf is not > available. e.g., add check in configure to define HAVE_LIBBPF and move > the existing code and move under else branch. Wouldn't it be better to statically compile against libbpf in this case and get rid a lot of BPF-related code and simplify the rest of it? This can be easily done by using libbpf through submodule, the same way as BCC and pahole do it.
