Re: [bpf PATCH v3] bpf: verifier, do_refine_retval_range may clamp umin to 0 incorrectly

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 1/29/20 8:28 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 8:25 AM Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Fixes: 849fa50662fbc ("bpf/verifier: refine retval R0 state for bpf_get_stack helper")
> >>> Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> Applied, thanks!
> > 
> > Daniel,
> > did you run the selftests before applying?
> > This patch breaks two.
> > We have to find a different fix.
> > 
> > ./test_progs -t get_stack
> > 68: (85) call bpf_get_stack#67
> >   R0=inv(id=0,smax_value=800) R1_w=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0)
> > R2_w=map_value(id=0,off=0,ks=4,vs=1600,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0;
> > 0xffffffff)) R3_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0;
> > 0xffffffff)) R4_w=inv0 R6=ctx(id=0,off=0,im?
> > R2 unbounded memory access, make sure to bounds check any array access
> > into a map
> 
> Sigh, had it in my wip pre-rebase tree when running tests. I've revert it from the
> tree since this needs to be addressed. Sorry for the trouble.

Thanks I'm looking into it now. Not sure how I missed it on
selftests either older branch or I missed the test somehow. I've
updated toolchain and kernel now so shouldn't happen again.

Thanks,
John



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux