RE: [PATCH bpf-next 2/6] selftests/xsk: Add tail adjustment functionality to XDP

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stanislav Fomichev <stfomichev@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2025 4:07 AM
> To: Vyavahare, Tushar <tushar.vyavahare@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; bjorn@xxxxxxxxxx; Karlsson,
> Magnus <magnus.karlsson@xxxxxxxxx>; Fijalkowski, Maciej
> <maciej.fijalkowski@xxxxxxxxx>; jonathan.lemon@xxxxxxxxx;
> davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; kuba@xxxxxxxxxx; pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx; ast@xxxxxxxxxx;
> daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/6] selftests/xsk: Add tail adjustment functionality
> to XDP
> 
> On 02/25, Vyavahare, Tushar wrote:
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Stanislav Fomichev <stfomichev@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2025 11:17 PM
> > > To: Vyavahare, Tushar <tushar.vyavahare@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; bjorn@xxxxxxxxxx;
> > > Karlsson, Magnus <magnus.karlsson@xxxxxxxxx>; Fijalkowski, Maciej
> > > <maciej.fijalkowski@xxxxxxxxx>; jonathan.lemon@xxxxxxxxx;
> > > davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; kuba@xxxxxxxxxx; pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx;
> > > ast@xxxxxxxxxx; daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/6] selftests/xsk: Add tail adjustment
> > > functionality to XDP
> > >
> > > On 02/20, Tushar Vyavahare wrote:
> > > > Introduce a new function, xsk_xdp_adjust_tail, within the XDP
> > > > program to adjust the tail of packets. This function utilizes
> > > > bpf_xdp_adjust_tail to modify the packet size dynamically based on the
> 'count'
> > > variable.
> > > >
> > > > If the adjustment fails, the packet is dropped using XDP_DROP to
> > > > ensure processing of only correctly modified packets.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Tushar Vyavahare <tushar.vyavahare@xxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Any reason not to combine patches 2..5 into a single one? I looked
> > > through each one briefly and it's a bit hard to follow when trying to put
> everything together..
> >
> > Maybe that was too many patches. How about this?
> >
> > #1: selftests/xsk: Add packet stream replacement function
> > #2: selftests/xsk: Add tail adjustment test functionality to AF_XDP.
> > #3: selftests/xsk: Add support check for bpf_xdp_adjust_tail() helper in
> >     xskxceiver
> > #4: selftests/xsk: Implement and test packet resizing with
> >     bpf_xdp_adjust_tail
> 
> Even that might be too much. #1 is clearly refactoring - keep it separate. The rest
> seems like it belongs to the same testcase(s)? I'd put patches 2,3,4,5,6 in the
> same patch.
> 
> For example, you add bpf xsk_xdp_adjust_tail function, but there are not callers
> in the same patch, so it's not clear what's the context.
> Same for testapp_xdp_adjust_tail - there is no caller, so the reader needs to go to
> the next patch to put it all together. Same for testapp_adjust_tail...


Make sense. Will fix it and submit a v2.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux