Re: [PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: Fix unneeded extra initialization in bpf_map_batch_common

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: Fix unneeded extra initialization in bpf_map_batch_common
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 15:33:18 +0100
Cc: Yonghong Song <yhs@xxxxxx>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@xxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20200116045918.75597-1-brianvv@google.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.2

On 1/16/20 5:59 AM, Brian Vazquez wrote:

bpf_attr doesn't required to be declared with '= {}' as memset is used
in the code.

Fixes: 2ab3d86ea1859 ("libbpf: Add libbpf support to batch ops")
Reported-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Brian Vazquez <brianvv@xxxxxxxxxx>


Applied, thanks!

References:
- [PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: Fix unneeded extra initialization in bpf_map_batch_common
  - From: Brian Vazquez

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/2] xdp: Move devmap bulk queue into struct net_device
Next by Date: [RFT PATCH 00/13] tracing: kprobes: Introduce async unregistration
Previous by thread: [PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: Fix unneeded extra initialization in bpf_map_batch_common
Next by thread: [PATCH bpf 0/2] Fix the classification based on port ranges in bpf hook
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Samsung SoC] [Linux Rockchip SoC] [Linux Actions SoC] [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors] [Linux NFS] [Linux NILFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux