[PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: Fix unneeded extra initialization in bpf_map_batch_common

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



bpf_attr doesn't required to be declared with '= {}' as memset is used
in the code.

Fixes: 2ab3d86ea1859 ("libbpf: Add libbpf support to batch ops")
Reported-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Brian Vazquez <brianvv@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c
index 317727d612149..ed42b006533c4 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c
@@ -457,7 +457,7 @@ static int bpf_map_batch_common(int cmd, int fd, void  *in_batch,
 				__u32 *count,
 				const struct bpf_map_batch_opts *opts)
 {
-	union bpf_attr attr = {};
+	union bpf_attr attr;
 	int ret;
 
 	if (!OPTS_VALID(opts, bpf_map_batch_opts))
-- 
2.25.0.rc1.283.g88dfdc4193-goog




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux