Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 06/11] bpf, sockmap: Don't set up sockmap progs for listening sockets

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 02:07 AM CET, John Fastabend wrote:
> John Fastabend wrote:
>> Jakub Sitnicki wrote:
>> > Now that sockmap can hold listening sockets, when setting up the psock we
>> > will (i) grab references to verdict/parser progs, and (2) override socket
>> > upcalls sk_data_ready and sk_write_space.
>> >
>> > We cannot redirect to listening sockets so we don't need to link the socket
>> > to the BPF progs, but more importantly we don't want the listening socket
>> > to have overridden upcalls because they would get inherited by child
>> > sockets cloned from it.
>> >
>> > Introduce a separate initialization path for listening sockets that does
>> > not change the upcalls and ignores the BPF progs.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > ---
>> >  net/core/sock_map.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> >  1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>>
>> Any reason only support for sock_map types are added? We can also support
>> sock_hash I presume? Could be a follow up patch I guess but if its not
>> too much trouble would be worth adding now vs trying to detect at run
>> time later. I think it should be as simple as using similar logic as
>> below in sock_hash_update_common
>>
>> Thanks.
>
> After running through the other patches I think its probably OK to do hash
> support as a follow up. Up to you.

Yes, preferably. This series is already into double digits.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux