Re: [PATCH bpf v2] samples/bpf: remove unnecessary -I flags from libbpf EXTRA_CFLAGS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2024-12-02 at 16:52 -0800, Eduard Zingerman wrote:

[...]

> > Naive question: why pass EXTRA_CFLAGS to libbpf at all? Can we drop it?
> 
> This was added by the commit [0].
> As far as I understand, the idea is to pass the following flags:
> 
>     ifeq ($(ARCH), arm)
>     # Strip all except -D__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ option needed to handle linux
>     # headers when arm instruction set identification is requested.
>     ARM_ARCH_SELECTOR := $(filter -D__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__%, $(KBUILD_CFLAGS))
>     ...
>     TPROGS_CFLAGS += $(ARM_ARCH_SELECTOR)
>     endif
> 
>     ifeq ($(ARCH), mips)
>     TPROGS_CFLAGS += -D__SANE_USERSPACE_TYPES__
>     ...
>     endif
> 
> Not sure if these are still necessary.
> 
> [0] commit d8ceae91e9f0 ("samples/bpf: Provide C/LDFLAGS to libbpf")
> 

But this means that I should include sysroot part in the COMMON_CFLAGS.
I'll get the arm cross-compilation environment and double check.






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux