Vadim Fedorenko wrote: > The original code is obviously optimized out, but the intention, I > believe, was to check if the jump is conditional or not. > So the proper fix should change the code to check cond: > > - if (ARC_CC_AL) > + if (cond == ARC_CC_AL) That is absolutely correct. If a new patch is not submitted soon I'll try to fix it myself. Cheers, Shahab
