On 11/11/2024 14:19, Hardevsinh Palaniya wrote:
The condition 'if (ARC_CC_AL)' is always true, as ARC_CC_AL is a constant
integer. This makes the check redundant, so it is safe to remove.
Signed-off-by: Hardevsinh Palaniya <hardevsinh.palaniya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arc/net/bpf_jit_arcv2.c | 5 +----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arc/net/bpf_jit_arcv2.c b/arch/arc/net/bpf_jit_arcv2.c
index 4458e409ca0a..19792ce952be 100644
--- a/arch/arc/net/bpf_jit_arcv2.c
+++ b/arch/arc/net/bpf_jit_arcv2.c
@@ -2916,10 +2916,7 @@ bool check_jmp_32(u32 curr_off, u32 targ_off, u8 cond)
addendum = (cond == ARC_CC_AL) ? 0 : INSN_len_normal;
disp = get_displacement(curr_off + addendum, targ_off);
- if (ARC_CC_AL)
- return is_valid_far_disp(disp);
- else
- return is_valid_near_disp(disp);
+ return is_valid_far_disp(disp);
}
/*
The original code is obviously optimized out, but the intention, I
believe, was to check if the jump is conditional or not.
So the proper fix should change the code to check cond:
- if (ARC_CC_AL)
+ if (cond == ARC_CC_AL)