From: Kunwu Chan <chentao@xxxxxxxxxx> When PREEMPT_RT is enabled, 'spinlock_t' becomes preemptible and bpf program has owned a raw_spinlock under a interrupt handler, which results in invalid lock acquire context. [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] 6.12.0-rc5-next-20241031-syzkaller #0 Not tainted ----------------------------- swapper/0/0 is trying to lock: ffff8880261e7a00 (&trie->lock){....}-{3:3}, at: trie_delete_elem+0x96/0x6a0 kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c:462 other info that might help us debug this: context-{3:3} 5 locks held by swapper/0/0: #0: ffff888020bb75c8 (&vp_dev->lock){-...}-{3:3}, at: vp_vring_interrupt drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c:80 [inline] #0: ffff888020bb75c8 (&vp_dev->lock){-...}-{3:3}, at: vp_interrupt+0x142/0x200 drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c:113 #1: ffff88814174a120 (&vb->stop_update_lock){-...}-{3:3}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline] #1: ffff88814174a120 (&vb->stop_update_lock){-...}-{3:3}, at: stats_request+0x6f/0x230 drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c:438 #2: ffffffff8e939f20 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:337 [inline] #2: ffffffff8e939f20 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:849 [inline] #2: ffffffff8e939f20 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: __queue_work+0x199/0xf50 kernel/workqueue.c:2259 #3: ffff8880b863dd18 (&pool->lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: __queue_work+0x759/0xf50 #4: ffffffff8e939f20 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:337 [inline] #4: ffffffff8e939f20 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:849 [inline] #4: ffffffff8e939f20 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: __bpf_trace_run kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2339 [inline] #4: ffffffff8e939f20 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: bpf_trace_run1+0x1d6/0x520 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2380 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc5-next-20241031-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 09/13/2024 Call Trace: <IRQ> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:120 print_lock_invalid_wait_context kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4826 [inline] check_wait_context kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4898 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x15a8/0x2100 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5176 lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849 __raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:110 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0xd5/0x120 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:162 trie_delete_elem+0x96/0x6a0 kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c:462 bpf_prog_2c29ac5cdc6b1842+0x43/0x47 bpf_dispatcher_nop_func include/linux/bpf.h:1290 [inline] __bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:701 [inline] bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:708 [inline] __bpf_trace_run kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2340 [inline] bpf_trace_run1+0x2ca/0x520 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2380 trace_workqueue_activate_work+0x186/0x1f0 include/trace/events/workqueue.h:59 __queue_work+0xc7b/0xf50 kernel/workqueue.c:2338 queue_work_on+0x1c2/0x380 kernel/workqueue.c:2390 queue_work include/linux/workqueue.h:662 [inline] stats_request+0x1a3/0x230 drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c:441 vring_interrupt+0x21d/0x380 drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c:2595 vp_vring_interrupt drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c:82 [inline] vp_interrupt+0x192/0x200 drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c:113 __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x29a/0xa80 kernel/irq/handle.c:158 handle_irq_event_percpu kernel/irq/handle.c:193 [inline] handle_irq_event+0x89/0x1f0 kernel/irq/handle.c:210 handle_fasteoi_irq+0x48a/0xae0 kernel/irq/chip.c:720 generic_handle_irq_desc include/linux/irqdesc.h:173 [inline] handle_irq arch/x86/kernel/irq.c:247 [inline] call_irq_handler arch/x86/kernel/irq.c:259 [inline] __common_interrupt+0x136/0x230 arch/x86/kernel/irq.c:285 common_interrupt+0xb4/0xd0 arch/x86/kernel/irq.c:278 </IRQ> Reported-by: syzbot+b506de56cbbb63148c33@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/6723db4a.050a0220.35b515.0168.GAE@xxxxxxxxxx/ Fixes: 66150d0dde03 ("bpf, lpm: Make locking RT friendly") Signed-off-by: Kunwu Chan <chentao@xxxxxxxxxx> --- kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c b/kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c index 9b60eda0f727..373cdcfa0505 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ struct lpm_trie { size_t n_entries; size_t max_prefixlen; size_t data_size; - spinlock_t lock; + raw_spinlock_t lock; }; /* This trie implements a longest prefix match algorithm that can be used to @@ -330,7 +330,7 @@ static long trie_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, if (key->prefixlen > trie->max_prefixlen) return -EINVAL; - spin_lock_irqsave(&trie->lock, irq_flags); + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&trie->lock, irq_flags); /* Allocate and fill a new node */ @@ -437,7 +437,7 @@ static long trie_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, kfree(im_node); } - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&trie->lock, irq_flags); + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&trie->lock, irq_flags); kfree_rcu(free_node, rcu); return ret; @@ -459,7 +459,7 @@ static long trie_delete_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *_key) if (key->prefixlen > trie->max_prefixlen) return -EINVAL; - spin_lock_irqsave(&trie->lock, irq_flags); + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&trie->lock, irq_flags); /* Walk the tree looking for an exact key/length match and keeping * track of the path we traverse. We will need to know the node @@ -535,7 +535,7 @@ static long trie_delete_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *_key) free_node = node; out: - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&trie->lock, irq_flags); + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&trie->lock, irq_flags); kfree_rcu(free_parent, rcu); kfree_rcu(free_node, rcu); @@ -581,7 +581,7 @@ static struct bpf_map *trie_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr) offsetof(struct bpf_lpm_trie_key_u8, data); trie->max_prefixlen = trie->data_size * 8; - spin_lock_init(&trie->lock); + raw_spin_lock_init(&trie->lock); return &trie->map; } -- 2.34.1