On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 9:30 AM Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Jason Xing wrote: > > From: Jason Xing <kernelxing@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > We need a separate tsflag to control bpf extension feature so that > > we will not affect the behaviors of existing applications. > > > > The idea of introducing requestors for better extension (not only > > serving bpf extension) comes from Vadim Fedorenko. > > As also said in the cover letter: I prefer sk_tstflags_bpf. > > This array approach adds code churn, may have cacheline effects by > moving other fields and anticipates I don't see a third requestor > happening. And if it does, we'll deal with it then. Got it. Thanks. I will adjust it accordingly.
