Re: [PATCH net-next v2 01/12] net-timestamp: introduce socket tsflag requestors

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jason Xing wrote:
> From: Jason Xing <kernelxing@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> We need a separate tsflag to control bpf extension feature so that
> we will not affect the behaviors of existing applications.
> 
> The idea of introducing requestors for better extension (not only
> serving bpf extension) comes from Vadim Fedorenko.

As also said in the cover letter: I prefer sk_tstflags_bpf.

This array approach adds code churn, may have cacheline effects by
moving other fields and anticipates I don't see a third requestor
happening. And if it does, we'll deal with it then.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux