Re: Possible deadlock in bpf_common_lru_pop_free

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: Possible deadlock in bpf_common_lru_pop_free
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2024 12:25:09 +0200
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>, bpf <bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Hsin-Wei Hung <hsinweih@xxxxxxx>, Ardalan Amiri Sani <ardalan@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <CAPPBnEZQDVN6VqnQXvVqGoB+ukOtHGZ9b9U0OLJJYvRoSsMY_g@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Sep 28, 2024 at 4:02 AM Priya Bala Govindasamy <pgovind2@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> SEC("kprobe/bpf_lru_pop_free+0x352")
> int test_prog2(void *ctx){

Instead of resending old issue and/or claiming new bug
please send a patch that makes these functions "noinstr".

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Possible deadlock in bpf_common_lru_pop_free
  - From: Priya Bala Govindasamy

References:
- Possible deadlock in bpf_common_lru_pop_free
  - From: Priya Bala Govindasamy

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftests: bpf: Add missing per-arch include path
Next by Date: Re: Possible deadlock in bpf_common_lru_push_free
Previous by thread: Possible deadlock in bpf_common_lru_pop_free
Next by thread: Re: Possible deadlock in bpf_common_lru_pop_free
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Samsung SoC] [Linux Rockchip SoC] [Linux Actions SoC] [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors] [Linux NFS] [Linux NILFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux