Hi Serge(y)
Thank you for reviewing the patch.
On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 6:49 AM Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Jitendra
>
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 03:18:16PM -0700, jitendra.vegiraju@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > From: Jitendra Vegiraju <jitendra.vegiraju@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Integrate dw25gmac support into stmmac hardware interface handling.
> > Added a new entry to the stmmac_hw table in hwif.c.
> > Define new macros DW25GMAC_CORE_4_00 and DW25GMAC_ID to identify 25GMAC
> > device.
> > Since BCM8958x is an early adaptor device, the synopsis_id reported in HW
> > is 0x32 and device_id is DWXGMAC_ID. Provide override support by defining
> > synopsys_dev_id member in struct stmmac_priv so that driver specific setup
> > functions can override the hardware reported values.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jitendra Vegiraju <jitendra.vegiraju@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/common.h | 2 ++
> > drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/hwif.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++--
> > drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h | 1 +
> > 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/common.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/common.h
> > index 684489156dce..46edbe73a124 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/common.h
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/common.h
> > @@ -38,9 +38,11 @@
> > #define DWXGMAC_CORE_2_10 0x21
> > #define DWXGMAC_CORE_2_20 0x22
> > #define DWXLGMAC_CORE_2_00 0x20
> > +#define DW25GMAC_CORE_4_00 0x40
> >
> > /* Device ID */
> > #define DWXGMAC_ID 0x76
> > +#define DW25GMAC_ID 0x55
> > #define DWXLGMAC_ID 0x27
> >
> > #define STMMAC_CHAN0 0 /* Always supported and default for all chips */
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/hwif.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/hwif.c
> > index 29367105df54..97e5594ddcda 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/hwif.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/hwif.c
> > @@ -278,6 +278,27 @@ static const struct stmmac_hwif_entry {
> > .est = &dwmac510_est_ops,
> > .setup = dwxlgmac2_setup,
> > .quirks = stmmac_dwxlgmac_quirks,
>
> > + }, {
> > + .gmac = false,
> > + .gmac4 = false,
> > + .xgmac = true,
> > + .min_id = DW25GMAC_CORE_4_00,
> > + .dev_id = DW25GMAC_ID,
> > + .regs = {
> > + .ptp_off = PTP_XGMAC_OFFSET,
> > + .mmc_off = MMC_XGMAC_OFFSET,
> > + .est_off = EST_XGMAC_OFFSET,
> > + },
> > + .desc = &dwxgmac210_desc_ops,
> > + .dma = &dw25gmac400_dma_ops,
> > + .mac = &dwxgmac210_ops,
> > + .hwtimestamp = &stmmac_ptp,
> > + .mode = NULL,
> > + .tc = &dwmac510_tc_ops,
> > + .mmc = &dwxgmac_mmc_ops,
> > + .est = &dwmac510_est_ops,
> > + .setup = dwxgmac2_setup,
> > + .quirks = NULL,
> > },
>
> This can be replaced with just:
>
> + }, {
> + .gmac = false,
> + .gmac4 = false,
> + .xgmac = true,
> + .min_id = DW25GMAC_CORE_4_00,
> + .dev_id = DWXGMAC_ID, /* Early DW 25GMAC IP-core had XGMAC ID */
> + .regs = {
> + .ptp_off = PTP_XGMAC_OFFSET,
> + .mmc_off = MMC_XGMAC_OFFSET,
> + .est_off = EST_XGMAC_OFFSET,
> + },
> + .desc = &dwxgmac210_desc_ops,
> + .dma = &dw25gmac400_dma_ops,
> + .mac = &dwxgmac210_ops,
> + .hwtimestamp = &stmmac_ptp,
> + .mode = NULL,
> + .tc = &dwmac510_tc_ops,
> + .mmc = &dwxgmac_mmc_ops,
> + .est = &dwmac510_est_ops,
> + .setup = dw25gmac_setup,
> + .quirks = NULL,
> }
>
> and you won't need to pre-define the setup() method in the
> glue driver. Instead you can define a new dw25xgmac_setup() method in
> the dwxgmac2_core.c as it's done for the DW XGMAC/LXGMAC IP-cores.
>
> Note if your device is capable to work with up to 10Gbps speed, then
> just set the plat_stmmacenet_data::max_speed field to SPEED_10000.
> Alternatively if you really need to specify the exact MAC
> capabilities, then you can implement what Russell suggested here
> sometime ago:
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/Zf3ifH%2FCjyHtmXE3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
>
I like your suggestion to add one stmmac_hw[] array entry (entry_a) for this
"early release" DW25GMAC IP and another entry (entry_b) for final DW25MAC
IP, in the process eliminate the need for a new member variable in struct
stmmac_priv.
However, I would like to bring to your attention that this device requires
special handling for both synopsys_id and dev_id.
This device is reporting 0x32 for synopsys_id and 0x76(XGMAC) for dev_id.
The final 25GMAC spec will have 0x40 for synopsys_id and 0x55(25GMAC) for
dev_id.
So, in order to avoid falsely qualifying other XGMAC devices with
synopsis_id >=0x32 as DW25GMAC, I am thinking we will have to overwrite the
synopsys_id to 0x40 (DW25GMAC_CORE_4_00) in glue driver using existing
glue driver override mechanism.
We can implement dw25gmac_setup() in dwxgmac2_core.c for generic 25GMAC
case. But, this glue driver will have to rely on its own setup function
to override the synopsys_id as DW25GMAC_CORE_4_00.
Do you think it looks reasonable?
If yes, do you want me to add the generic 25GMAC stmmac_hw[] entry
("entry_b") now or when
such a device becomes available for testing?
> If you also have a DW 25GMAC-based device with 0x55 device ID, then
> just add another stmmac_hw[] array entry.
>
> > };
> >
> > int hw_cap_support;
> > int synopsys_id;
>
> > + int synopsys_dev_id;
>
> With the suggestion above implemented you won't need this.
Got it. Thanks.
>
> -Serge(y)
>
> > u32 msg_enable;
> > int wolopts;
> > int wol_irq;
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
