On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 08:42:10PM +0200 Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 7:03 PM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo > <acme@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 10:57:22AM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote: > > > On 22. 08. 24, 17:24, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 11:55:05AM +0800, Shung-Hsi Yu wrote: > > > > I stumbled on this limitation as well when trying to build the kernel on > > > > a Libre Computer rk3399-pc board with only 4GiB of RAM, there I just > > > > created a swapfile and it managed to proceed, a bit slowly, but worked > > > > as well. > > > > > > Here, it hits the VM space limit (3 G). > > > > right, in my case it was on a 64-bit system, so just not enough memory, > > not address space. > > > > > > Please let me know if what is in the 'next' branch of: > > > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/devel/pahole/pahole.git > > > > > > Works for you, that will be extra motivation to move it to the master > > > > branch and cut 1.28. > > > > > on 64bit (-j1): > > > * master: 3.706 GB > > > (* master + my changes: 3.559 GB) > > > * next: 3.157 GB > > > > > on 32bit: > > > * master-j1: 2.445 GB > > > * master-j16: 2.608 GB > > > * master-j32: 2.811 GB > > > * next-j1: 2.256 GB > > > * next-j16: 2.401 GB > > > * next-j32: 2.613 GB > > > > > > It's definitely better. So I think it could work now, if the thread count > > > was limited to 1 on 32bit. As building with -j10, -j20 randomly fails on > > > random machines (32bit processes only of course). Unlike -j1. > > > > Cool, I just merged a patch from Alan Maguire that should help with the > > parallel case, would be able to test it? It is in the 'next' branch: > > > > ⬢[acme@toolbox pahole]$ git log --oneline -5 > > f37212d1611673a2 (HEAD -> master) pahole: Teduce memory usage by smarter deleting of CUs > > > > *R*edzce? memory usage ... > If you meant that further typo it's golden, and if not the irony is rich :) Either way this is my favorite email of the day! Cheers, Phil > -Sedat- > > > Excerpt of the above: > > > > This leads to deleting ~90 CUs during parallel vmlinux BTF generation > > versus deleting just 1 prior to this change. > > > > c7ec9200caa7d485 btf_encoder: Add "distilled_base" BTF feature to split BTF generation > > bc4e6a9adfc72758 pahole: Sync with libbpf-1.5 > > 5e3ed3ec2947c69f pahole: Do --lang_exclude CU filtering earlier > > c46455bb0379fa38 dwarf_loader: Allow filtering CUs early in loading > > ⬢[acme@toolbox pahole]$ > > > > - Arnaldo > > > --
