Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/3] Support passing BPF iterator to kfuncs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello:

This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>:

On Thu,  8 Aug 2024 16:22:27 -0700 you wrote:
> Add support for passing BPF iterator state to any kfunc. Such kfunc has to
> declare such argument with valid `struct bpf_iter_<type> *` type and should
> use "__iter" suffix in argument name, following the established suffix-based
> convention. We add a simple test/demo iterator getter in bpf_testmod.
> 
> Andrii Nakryiko (3):
>   bpf: extract iterator argument type and name validation logic
>   bpf: allow passing struct bpf_iter_<type> as kfunc arguments
>   selftests/bpf: test passing iterator to a kfunc
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next,1/3] bpf: extract iterator argument type and name validation logic
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/496ddd19a0fa
  - [bpf-next,2/3] bpf: allow passing struct bpf_iter_<type> as kfunc arguments
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/baebe9aaba1e
  - [bpf-next,3/3] selftests/bpf: test passing iterator to a kfunc
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/b0cd726f9a82

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux