On Wed, 2024-08-21 at 09:59 -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
[...]
> > Fixes: 74753e1462e7 ("libbpf: Replace btf__type_by_id() with btf_type_by_id().")
> > Reported-by: Liu RuiTong <cnitlrt@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAK55_s6do7C+DVwbwY_7nKfUz0YLDoiA1v6X3Y9+p0sWzipFSA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> > Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > tools/lib/bpf/relo_core.c | 5 +++++
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/relo_core.c b/tools/lib/bpf/relo_core.c
> > index 63a4d5ad12d1..a04724831ebc 100644
> > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/relo_core.c
> > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/relo_core.c
> > @@ -1297,6 +1297,11 @@ int bpf_core_calc_relo_insn(const char *prog_name,
> >
> > local_id = relo->type_id;
> > local_type = btf_type_by_id(local_btf, local_id);
> > + if (!local_type) {
>
> This is a meaningless check at least for libbpf's implementation of
> btf_type_by_id(), it never returns NULL. Commit you point to in Fixes
> tag clearly states the differences.
That is not true on kernel side.
bpf_core_calc_relo_insn() is called from bpf_core_apply():
int bpf_core_apply(struct bpf_core_ctx *ctx, const struct bpf_core_relo *relo,
int relo_idx, void *insn)
{
bool need_cands = relo->kind != BPF_CORE_TYPE_ID_LOCAL;
...
if (need_cands) {
...
// code below would report an error if relo->type_id is bogus
cc = bpf_core_find_cands(ctx, relo->type_id);
if (IS_ERR(cc)) {
bpf_log(ctx->log, "target candidate search failed for %d\n",
relo->type_id);
err = PTR_ERR(cc);
goto out;
}
...
}
err = bpf_core_calc_relo_insn((void *)ctx->log, relo, relo_idx, ctx->btf, &cands, specs,
&targ_res);
...
}
If `need_cands` is false the bogus type_id could reach into bpf_core_calc_relo_insn().
Which is exactly the case with repro submitted by Liu.
There is also a simplified repro here:
https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/commit/017a9dcf17e572f9b7c32aa62a81df8ef41cef17
But I can't submit it as a test yet.
>
> So you'd need to validate local_id directly against number of types in
> local_btf.
How is this better than a null check?
>
> pw-bot: cr
>
>
> > + pr_warn("prog '%s': relo #%d: bad type id %u\n",
>
> nit: this part of CO-RE-related code normally uses [%u] "syntax" to
> point to BTF type IDs, please adjust for consistency
Ok
