On Mon, 2024-08-12 at 18:42 +0200, David Sterba wrote: > On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 12:30:52PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote: > > Unlink changes the link count on the target inode. POSIX mandates that > > the ctime must also change when this occurs. > > Right, thanks. According to https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/unlink.html: > > Upon successful completion, unlink() shall mark for update the last data > modification and last file status change timestamps of the parent > directory. Also, if the file's link count is not 0, the last file status > change timestamp of the file shall be marked for update. > Weird way to phrase to that. IMO, we still want to stamp the inode's ctime even if the link count goes to 0. That's what Linux generally does, anyway. Oh well.. > > > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx> FWIW, this should probably go in via the btrfs tree. -- Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
