On (19/12/18 12:10), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > On (19/12/11 08:01), Andrey Zhizhikin wrote: > [..] > > @@ -210,6 +210,7 @@ static bool fs__env_override(struct fs *fs) > > size_t name_len = strlen(fs->name); > > /* name + "_PATH" + '\0' */ > > char upper_name[name_len + 5 + 1]; > > + > > memcpy(upper_name, fs->name, name_len); > > mem_toupper(upper_name, name_len); > > strcpy(&upper_name[name_len], "_PATH"); > > @@ -219,7 +220,8 @@ static bool fs__env_override(struct fs *fs) > > return false; > > > > fs->found = true; > > - strncpy(fs->path, override_path, sizeof(fs->path)); > > + strncpy(fs->path, override_path, sizeof(fs->path) - 1); > > + fs->path[sizeof(fs->path) - 1] = '\0'; > > I think the trend these days is to prefer stracpy/strscpy over > strcpy/strlcpy/strncpy. Scratch that. This is user-space, I should pay more attention. -ss