> think it's OK, but I'd also like someone like Christian to confirm > that d_path() can't actually end up sleeping. Glancing over it, I We annotated ->d_dname() as non-sleepable in locking.rst so even ->d_dname() shouldn't and curently doesn't sleep. There's a few codepaths that end up calling d_path() under spinlocks but none of them should end up calling anything related to ->d_name() and so wouldn't be affected even if it did sleep.
