Re: pull-request: bpf 2024-07-25

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 25 Jul 2024 18:30:22 +0000 Manu Bretelle wrote:
> I did not play with llvm19 yet.
> 
> Checking the BPF CI netdev builds that went red yesterday 8pm PST leads to 
> https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/10087416772
> 
> BPF selftests build is failing with:
> 
>     CC bench_local_storage_create.o 
> 3298 CC bench_htab_mem.o 
> 3299 CC bench_bpf_crypto.o 
> 3300 BINARY xskxceiver 
> 3301 <command-line>: error: "_GNU_SOURCE" redefined [-Werror] 
> 3302 <command-line>: note: this is the location of the previous definition 
> 3303 BINARY xdp_hw_metadata 
> 3304 BINARY xdp_features 
> 3305 TEST-OBJ [test_maps] htab_map_batch_ops.test.o 
> 3306 TEST-OBJ [test_maps] lpm_trie_map_batch_ops.test.o 
> 3307 TEST-OBJ [test_maps] sk_storage_map.test.o 
> 3308 TEST-OBJ [test_maps] map_percpu_stats.test.o
> 
> across all combos or architectures/compilers. I did not see anything related to LLVM19 though.
> 
> last failing build was today 5:17 am PST https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/10093925751
> with the same symptoms.
> 
> First successful at 8:02am: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/10096557745

Ugh, seems like the GitHub UI messes up Firefox's ability to search :(
I see it now, and it makes sense. Linus ended up with cc937dad85aea
which was supposed to never make it upstream.

On the LLVM19 I see this in all outputs:
ar: libLLVM.so.19.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

But presumably that's harmless, then.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux