> On Jul 25, 2024, at 7:16 AM, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Thu, 25 Jul 2024 16:13:00 +0200 Daniel Borkmann wrote: >> On 7/25/24 3:30 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote: >>> On Thu, 25 Jul 2024 13:43:12 +0200 Daniel Borkmann wrote: >>>> Hi David, hi Jakub, hi Paolo, hi Eric, >>> >>> While I have you, is this a known in BPF CI problem? >>> >>> ar: libLLVM.so.19.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory >>> >>> Looks like our BPF CI builds are failing since 8pm PST yesterday. >> >> Looks like you may be one step ahead.. BPF CI runs tests with LLVM17 + LLVM18 >> at this point, so we haven't seen that issue yet. Maybe Manu has? I did not play with llvm19 yet. Checking the BPF CI netdev builds that went red yesterday 8pm PST leads to https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/10087416772 BPF selftests build is failing with: CC bench_local_storage_create.o 3298 CC bench_htab_mem.o 3299 CC bench_bpf_crypto.o 3300 BINARY xskxceiver 3301 <command-line>: error: "_GNU_SOURCE" redefined [-Werror] 3302 <command-line>: note: this is the location of the previous definition 3303 BINARY xdp_hw_metadata 3304 BINARY xdp_features 3305 TEST-OBJ [test_maps] htab_map_batch_ops.test.o 3306 TEST-OBJ [test_maps] lpm_trie_map_batch_ops.test.o 3307 TEST-OBJ [test_maps] sk_storage_map.test.o 3308 TEST-OBJ [test_maps] map_percpu_stats.test.o across all combos or architectures/compilers. I did not see anything related to LLVM19 though. last failing build was today 5:17 am PST https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/10093925751 with the same symptoms. First successful at 8:02am: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/10096557745 Manu > > FWIW we got a PR on the list last night which was based on fairly > recent version of Linus's tree. I dropped it from the test queue, > but I suspect once we FF this will come back.
