Hi Andrii, On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 04:52:57PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 10:55 PM Tony Ambardar <tony.ambardar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: [...] > > > > Tony Ambardar (19): > > selftests/bpf: Use pid_t consistently in test_progs.c > > selftests/bpf: Fix compile error from rlim_t in sk_storage_map.c > > selftests/bpf: Fix error compiling bpf_iter_setsockopt.c with musl > > libc > > selftests/bpf: Drop unneeded include in unpriv_helpers.c > > selftests/bpf: Drop unneeded include in sk_lookup.c > > selftests/bpf: Drop unneeded include in flow_dissector.c > > I squashed the above three patches into one, as they are the same kind > of fix with the same reasoning. The rest at least have a specific > error example, so I didn't touch them. > > But generally speaking, I think it's fair to combine the same kind of > fixes across a few files (for the future). Thanks for clarifying this and reviewing. My concern earlier was that squashing "Fixes:" tags could hinder backporting. Is that a non-issue? > Applied to bpf-next, thanks. > And thanks to Geliang Tang, YiFei Zhu, and Vadim Fedorenko for their feedback. Cheers, Tony Ambardar [...]
