Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/3] bpf: Check unsupported ops from the bpf_struct_ops's cfi_stubs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 7:45 AM kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Martin,
>
> kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
>
> [auto build test WARNING on bpf-next/master]
>
> url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Martin-KaFai-Lau/bpf-Check-unsupported-ops-from-the-bpf_struct_ops-s-cfi_stubs/20240720-144313
> base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git master
> patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240720062233.2319723-2-martin.lau%40linux.dev
> patch subject: [PATCH bpf-next 1/3] bpf: Check unsupported ops from the bpf_struct_ops's cfi_stubs
> config: i386-randconfig-001-20240720 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240720/202407202244.HvnUVyjM-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/config)
> compiler: gcc-7 (Ubuntu 7.5.0-6ubuntu2) 7.5.0
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240720/202407202244.HvnUVyjM-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/reproduce)
>
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202407202244.HvnUVyjM-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/
>
> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
>    kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c: In function 'bpf_struct_ops_supported':
> >> kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c:1045:48: warning: dereferencing 'void *' pointer
>      void *func_ptr = *(void **)(&st_ops->cfi_stubs[moff]);
>                                                    ^
>
>
> vim +1045 kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
>
>   1042
>   1043  int bpf_struct_ops_supported(const struct bpf_struct_ops *st_ops, u32 moff)
>   1044  {
> > 1045          void *func_ptr = *(void **)(&st_ops->cfi_stubs[moff]);

The compiler warning can be fixed with:
void *func_ptr = *(void **)(st_ops->cfi_stubs + moff);

The patch looks good to me. I tested it with bpf qdisc, and it does
what it is supposed to do by prohibiting users to attach to an
operator whose cfi stub is not defined.

Thanks,
Amery


>   1046
>   1047          return func_ptr ? 0 : -ENOTSUPP;
>   1048  }
>   1049
>
> --
> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
> https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux