Re: [PATCH 2/2] selftests/bpf: Change uretprobe syscall number in uprobe_syscall test

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 6:53 AM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Fixing the syscall number value.
>
> Fixes: 9e7f74e64ae5 ("selftests/bpf: Add uretprobe syscall call from user space test")
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>

is this selftest in probes/for-next already? If yes, I'd combine these
two patches to avoid any bisection problems

but either way

Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>


> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c
> index c8517c8f5313..bd8c75b620c2 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c
> @@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ static void test_uretprobe_regs_change(void)
>  }
>
>  #ifndef __NR_uretprobe
> -#define __NR_uretprobe 463
> +#define __NR_uretprobe 467
>  #endif
>
>  __naked unsigned long uretprobe_syscall_call_1(void)
> --
> 2.45.2
>





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux