Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: Remove tst_run from lwt_seg6local_prog_ops.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 7/10/24 4:16 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
The syzbot reported that the lwt_seg6 related BPF ops can be invoked
via bpf_test_run() without without entering input_action_end_bpf()
first.

Martin KaFai Lau said that self test for BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_SEG6LOCAL
probably didn't work since it was introduced in commit 04d4b274e2a
("ipv6: sr: Add seg6local action End.BPF"). The reason is that the
per-CPU variable seg6_bpf_srh_states::srh is never assigned in the self
test case but each BPF function expects it.

Remove test_run for BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_SEG6LOCAL.

Suggested-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@xxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: syzbot+608a2acde8c5a101d07d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fixes: d1542d4ae4df ("seg6: Use nested-BH locking for seg6_bpf_srh_states.")

We can also add in addition for reference:

Fixes: 004d4b274e2a ("ipv6: sr: Add seg6local action End.BPF")

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux