On 2024/06/27 1:27, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Jun 2024 09:02:22 +0900
> Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> On 2024/06/26 8:56, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>>> You are missing the point. The bug has nothing to do with bpf.
>>
>> The bug is caused by calling tracing hooks with rq lock held.
>> If tracing hooks do not exist, this bug does not exist.
>
> Could you expand on this. What tracing hooks are called with rq lock
> held? You mean the scheduling events?
Yes, trace_sched_switch().
__schedule() calls trace_sched_switch() hook with rq lock held.
#2: ffff8880b943e798 (&rq->__lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: raw_spin_rq_lock_nested+0x2a/0x140 kernel/sched/core.c:559
__bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:691 [inline]
bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:698 [inline]
__bpf_trace_run kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2403 [inline]
bpf_trace_run4+0x334/0x590 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2446
__traceiter_sched_switch+0x98/0xd0 include/trace/events/sched.h:222
trace_sched_switch include/trace/events/sched.h:222 [inline]
__schedule+0x2587/0x4a20 kernel/sched/core.c:6742
preempt_schedule_notrace+0x100/0x140 kernel/sched/core.c:7017
