On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 02:11:18PM GMT, Totoro W wrote: > Hi folks, Don't have answer to your question, but noticed that your email was sent without a subject. This looks like a worthwhile question, so perhaps consider resending? Without a subject this might be easily dismissed by the maintainers. Shung-Hsi > This is my first time to ask questions in this mailing list. I'm the > author of https://github.com/tw4452852/zbpf which is a framework to > write BPF programs with Zig toolchain. > During the development, as the BTF is totally generated by the Zig > toolchain, some naming conventions will make the BTF verifier refuse > to load. > Right now I have to patch the libbpf to do some fixup before loading > into the kernel > (https://github.com/tw4452852/libbpf_zig/blob/main/0001-temporary-WA-for-invalid-BTF-info-generated-by-Zig.patch). > Even though this just work-around the issue, I'm still curious about > the current naming sanitation, I want to know some background about > it. > If possible, could we relax this to accept more languages (like Zig) > to write BPF programs? Thanks in advance. > > Regards.
