For earlier 6.10. kernels we don't have data due to [3] (there is regression on XDP_DROP as well, but I believe it's turbo-boost issue, as I mentioned in issue). So if you want to run tests on 6.10. please see [3]. Summary XDP_DROP+mlx5@25G: kernel pps <5.14 20.5M baseline >=5.14 19M [0] <6.4 19-20M baseline for ELN kernels >=6.4 15M [4 and 5] (mentioned by Toke) >=6.10 ??? [3] >=6.10rc2 17M-18M > It looks like this is known since March, was this ever reported to Nvidia back > then? :/ Not sure if that's a question for me, I was told, filling an issue in Bugzilla/Jira is where our competences end. Who is supposed to report it to them? > Given XDP is in the critical path for many in production, we should think about > regular performance reporting for the different vendors for each released kernel, > similar to here [0]. I think this might be the part of upstream kernel testing with LNST? Maybe Jesper knows more about that? Until then, I think, I can let you know about new regressions we catch. Thanks, Sam. [0] https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-24054 [1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/search?terms=kernel-%5Cd.*eln*&type=build&match=regexp [2] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2469107 [3] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2282969 [4] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270408 [5] https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-24054
