Hi,
On Tue, 2024-06-18 at 15:56 +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote:
> @@ -1032,6 +1034,53 @@ static void check_sq_full_and_disable(struct virtnet_info *vi,
> }
> }
>
> +static void sg_fill_dma(struct scatterlist *sg, dma_addr_t addr, u32 len)
> +{
> + sg->dma_address = addr;
> + sg->length = len;
> +}
> +
> +static int virtnet_add_recvbuf_xsk(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct receive_queue *rq,
> + struct xsk_buff_pool *pool, gfp_t gfp)
> +{
> + struct xdp_buff **xsk_buffs;
> + dma_addr_t addr;
> + u32 len, i;
> + int err = 0;
Minor nit: the reverse xmas tree order is based on the full line len,
should be:
int err = 0;
u32 len, i;
[...]
> @@ -2226,6 +2281,7 @@ static bool try_fill_recv(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct receive_queue *rq,
> u64_stats_update_end_irqrestore(&rq->stats.syncp, flags);
> }
>
> + oom = err == -ENOMEM;
> return !oom;
Minor nit: 'oom' is used only in the above to lines. You could drop
such variable and just:
return err != -ENOMEM;
Please _do not_ repost just for the above, but please include such
changes if you should repost for other reasons.
Also try to include a detailed changelog in each patch after the tag
area and a '---' separator, it will simplify the review process.
Thanks,
Paolo
