在 2024/6/20 16:36, Oleg Nesterov 写道: > On 06/20, Liao, Chang wrote: >> >> However, when i asm porting uretprobe trampoline to arm64 >> to explore its benefits on that architecture, i discovered the problem that >> single slot is not large enought for trampoline code. > > Ah, but then I'd suggest to make the changelog more clear. It looks as > if the problem was introduced by the patch from Jiri. Note that we was > confused as well ;) Perhaps i should use 'RFC' in the subject line, instead of 'PATCH'? > > And, > > + /* Reserve enough slots for the uretprobe trampoline */ > + for (slot_nr = 0; > + slot_nr < max((insns_size / UPROBE_XOL_SLOT_BYTES), 1); > + slot_nr++) > > this doesn't look right. Just suppose that insns_size = UPROBE_XOL_SLOT_BYTES + 1. > I'd suggest DIV_ROUND_UP(insns_size, UPROBE_XOL_SLOT_BYTES). Oh, what a stupid mistake to me. thanks for pointing that out. > > And perhaps it would be better to send this change along with > uretprobe_trampoline_for_arm64 ? Sure, i would send them out in next revision. > > Oleg. > -- BR Liao, Chang