On 06/05, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > > WDYT? It's still fast, and it's simpler than the shadow stack idea, IMO. Andrii. I am alredy sleeping, I'll try to read your email tomorrow. Right now I can only say that everything is simpler than the shadow stack ;) > P.S. Regardless, maybe we should change the order in which we insert > consumers to uprobe? Right now uprobe consumer added later will be > executed first, which, while not wrong, is counter-intuitive. Agreed... Even if currently this doesn't really matter, I guess it is supposed that uc->handler() is "non-intrusive". Oleg.
